Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed6 June 20253359809

Toller Lane, Bradford, BD8 9JW

Planning appeal 3359809 at Toller Lane, Bradford, BD8 9JW (City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council) was allowed on 6 June 2025 by Inspector Bartlett R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the area and, if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed, taking into account any suitable alternatives.

a base station telecommunications installation. Proposed installation of a 22.50m monopole on proposed concrete base together with 12No. antennas, 2No. 300mm dishes, 2No. 600mm dishes, 7No. cabinets and associated ancillary works

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Bartlett R
Postcode
BD8 9AB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the area and, if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed, taking into account any suitable alternatives

What decided it

The absence of more suitable alternative sites within the required area meant the social and economic benefits of improved telecommunications coverage and capacity outweighed the moderate harm to character and appearance.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
DS1DS3
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 120

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

115 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed16 April 20263372647
    Footpath Outside 89, Harrogate Road, Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD2 3AX
  2. Dismissed22 October 20266013460
    Overgate Croft Cottage, Cocking Lane, Addingham, LS29 0QG
  3. Dismissed21 October 20266012661
    95 Godwin Street, Bradford, BD1 3PP
  4. Dismissed20 October 20266012872
    Keepers Cottege, North Bank Road, Bingley, Bradford, BD16 1UH
  5. Dismissed19 October 20266012715
    247, Girlington Road, Bradford, BD8 9NX

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.