Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed1 September 20253359956

Land Rear of 61-63 Rothbury Avenue, Rainham, RM13 9HY

Planning appeal 3359956 at Land Rear of 61-63 Rothbury Avenue, Rainham, RM13 9HY (London Borough of Havering) was dismissed on 1 September 2025 by Inspector Kemmann-Lane T, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

the erection of a single storey 1xbed bungalow to the rear of 61 and 63 Rothbury Avenue

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Kemmann-Lane T
Postcode
RM13 9HY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • the quality of the living conditions and amenity of future occupants of the development
  • whether the proposal would result in safe movement access/egress from the highway with regard to visibility splays, turning areas and fire emergency vehicle access

What decided it

The proposal fails to meet the quality of accommodation and design standards required for sustainable development, such that the modest contribution to housing supply cannot overcome the adverse effects on character and appearance and living conditions.

The modest contribution of the proposed dwelling to the housing supply was outweighed by the adverse effect on character and appearance of the area and the failure to provide satisfactory living conditions and amenity for future occupants.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 10
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 79Paragraph 73

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

148 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Havering

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed5 August 20263362455
    10 Avenue Road, Harold Wood, Romford, RM3 0SU
  2. Dismissed5 August 20263354668
    145v Turpin Avenue, , Romford, Havering, RM5 2LU
  3. Unknown4 August 20263360523
    22 Nelmes Crescent, Hornchurch, RM11 2QB
  4. Notice varied and upheld4 August 20263360522
    22 Nelmes Crescent, Hornchurch, RM11 2QB
  5. Dismissed4 August 20263359688
    30 Crow Lane, Romford, RM7 0EL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.