Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed30 July 20253360609

124A Guildford Street, CHERTSEY, KT16 9AH

change of use from Planning Use Class E (offices) to Planning Use Class C3, a four-bedroom flat and the formation of a roof terrace with 1100mm hand rails to match existing, provision of car parking space, bin storage and cycle storage within rear gated courtyard

Authority
Runnymede Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
James A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal has demonstrated that there would be safe access and egress for future occupants of the development in the event of a flood

What decided it

The proposal has not demonstrated a safe access and egress route for future occupants in the event of a flood, contrary to Policy EE13 of the Local Plan and the Framework's flood risk protection policies, which engage the presumption in favour of sustainable development.

Although the Council cannot demonstrate a 5-year housing land supply and paragraph 11(d) of the Framework would normally apply, the flood risk protection policies in the Framework provide a strong reason for refusal; the failure to demonstrate safe evacuation outweighs the limited housing and economic benefits.

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: Policy EE13

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.