Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 July 20253361351

30 Copsem Lane, Esher, KT10 9HE

Planning appeal 3361351 at 30 Copsem Lane, Esher, KT10 9HE (Elmbridge Borough Council) was dismissed on 22 July 2025 by Inspector De Freitas Terceiro P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

development comprising 26 flats with associated bin and cycle stores, parking and landscaping following demolition of existing house

Authority
Elmbridge Borough Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
De Freitas Terceiro P
Postcode
KT10 9HE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The substantial harm to the character and appearance of the area caused by the excessive bulk and mass of the proposed buildings significantly and demonstrably outweighs the housing benefits, even in the context of a shortfall in 5-year housing land supply.

The substantial harm to character and appearance, given significant weight under Framework policy, significantly and demonstrably outweighs the housing benefits and economic benefits of the scheme, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development does not apply.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS17 of the Core Strategy 2011Policy DM2 of the Development Management Plan 2015
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

144 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Elmbridge Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed28 October 20266013396
    23 Avondale Avenue, Esher, KT10 0DB
  2. Dismissed21 October 20266013327
    69 Alexandra Road, Thames Ditton, KT7 0QS
  3. Dismissed16 October 20266008605
    Pavement Outside Tesco Stores Ltd, 108 - 118 Walton Road East Molesey, East Molesey, KT8 0HP
  4. Dismissed16 October 20266008598
    Pavement Outside Tesco Ltd, 108 – 118 Walton Road, East Molesey, KT8 0HP
  5. Allowed14 October 20266009254
    Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, KT10 9AD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.