Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 July 20253361403

29 Hollis Avenue, Portishead, North Somerset, BS20 6TQ

construction of a 2-Bedroom bungalow

Authority
North Somerset Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Cahalane R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • the effect on the living conditions of future occupiers of the proposed bungalow, with particular regard to outlook, light and private outdoor garden space
  • whether the proposal would have a likely significant effect, alone or in combination with other plans and projects, on the North Somerset and Mendip Horseshoe Bats Special Area of Conservation

What decided it

The significant harm to the character and appearance of the surrounding area caused by the contrived and cramped siting of the bungalow, combined with inadequate living conditions for future occupiers, outweighed the moderate benefits of housing delivery and environmental improvements in the planning balance.

The adverse impacts of the development, particularly significant harm to character and appearance and inadequate living conditions for future occupiers, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the moderate benefits of housing delivery on a small site in a sustainable location and moderate environmental benefits from the air source heat pump, such that the material considerations did not indicate a decision should be made otherwise than in accordance with the development plan.

Framework references: 11, 195

Plan policies cited: Policy CS12, Policy DM32, Policy DM37

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.