®Planning appeal decision
Kaspas, 2 High Street, CANTERBURY, CT1 2JH
Installation of kitchen extraction system and retractable awning
- Authority
- Canterbury City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- retail · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Wallace J
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposals on the special architectural and historic interest of the Grade II* listed building 1 and 2, High Street; whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Canterbury Conservation Area; and whether the proposal would safeguard the Outstanding Universal Value of the Canterbury World Heritage Site
- Whether the proposal would provide for suitable odour dispersal
What decided it
Insufficient evidence and material deficiencies in the submitted plans and specifications meant the Inspector could not be certain that the internal works, shopfront and associated installations would preserve the special architectural and historic interest of the Grade II* listed building and not harm its significance, contrary to the statutory duty under section 16(2) of the Act.
Framework references: 207, 208, 212, 213
Plan policies cited: CDLP Policy DBE3, CDLP Policy DBE6, CDLP Policy QL12, CDLP Policy HE4, CDLP Policy HE5, CDLP Policy HE8, CDLP Policy HE9, CDLP Policy HE10
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.