Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 March 20263361622

Kaspas, 2 High Street, Canterbury, CT1 2JH

Planning appeal 3361622 at Kaspas, 2 High Street, Canterbury, CT1 2JH (Canterbury City Council) was dismissed on 5 March 2026 by Inspector Wallace J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposals on the special architectural and historic interest of the Grade II* listed building 1 and 2, High Street; whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Canterbury Conservation Area; and whether the proposal would safeguard the Outstanding Universal Value of the Canterbury World Heritage Site.

Installation of kitchen extraction system and retractable awning

Authority
Canterbury City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
retail · Other minor developments
Inspector
Wallace J
Postcode
CT1 2JH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposals on the special architectural and historic interest of the Grade II* listed building 1 and 2, High Street; whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Canterbury Conservation Area; and whether the proposal would safeguard the Outstanding Universal Value of the Canterbury World Heritage Site
  • Whether the proposal would provide for suitable odour dispersal

What decided it

Insufficient evidence and material deficiencies in the submitted plans and specifications meant the Inspector could not be certain that the internal works, shopfront and associated installations would preserve the special architectural and historic interest of the Grade II* listed building and not harm its significance, contrary to the statutory duty under section 16(2) of the Act.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
CDLP Policy DBE3CDLP Policy DBE6CDLP Policy QL12CDLP Policy HE4CDLP Policy HE5CDLP Policy HE8CDLP Policy HE9CDLP Policy HE10
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 207Paragraph 208Paragraph 212Paragraph 213

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

80 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Canterbury City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed28 September 20266008107
    Dane Cottage, Hoggs Lane, Petham, CT4 5PJ
  2. Dismissed28 September 20266008105
    Dane Cottage, Hogg Lane, Petham, CT4 5PJ
  3. Allowed24 September 20266010614
    82 Island Wall, Whitstable, CT5 1EL
  4. Allowed18 September 20266009081
    Ground Floor, 2 Douglas Road, Herne Bay, CT6 6AE
  5. Dismissed11 August 20266009628
    69 Joy Lane, Whitstable, CT5 4DD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.