Planning appeal decision
6 Goldcrest Walk, Thorpe Hesley, Rotherham, S61 2TS
Planning appeal 3361773 at 6 Goldcrest Walk, Thorpe Hesley, Rotherham, S61 2TS (Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council) was allowed on 6 May 2025 by Inspector Eggleton P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect on the character and appearance of the area.
a two storey side extension
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Eggleton P
- Postcode
- S61 2TS
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect on the character and appearance of the area
What decided it
The extension's set back position, narrow width, subservient design, and compliance with design policies meant it would not harm the character and appearance of the area.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS 28Policy SP 55
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Rotherham
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed27 October 20266011173Green Acres, Moat Lane, Wickersley, S66 1DZ
- Dismissed22 October 2026601264456 Knollbeck Lane, Brampton Bierlow, Rotherham, S73 0TP
- Dismissed15 October 20266013576Windsor,, Eastwood Vale, East Dene,, Rotherham,, S65 2DX
- Allowed13 October 20266008695Land at Harley Road, Harley, Rotherham, S62 7UD
- Dismissed7 September 2026601103923A Rowms Lane, Swinton, S64 8AA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®