Planning appeal decision
Land South of Copse View, Burnt Oak Lane, Newdigate, Surrey, RH5 5BJ
Planning appeal 3362077 at Land South of Copse View, Burnt Oak Lane, Newdigate, Surrey, RH5 5BJ (Mole Valley District Council) was dismissed on 5 August 2025 by Inspector Miles H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the site would be a suitable location for the proposed development with particular regard to accessibility by sustainable transport modes.
erection of detached two-storey dwelling with associated access and landscaping
- Authority
- Mole Valley District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Miles H
- Postcode
- RH5 5BJ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the site would be a suitable location for the proposed development with particular regard to accessibility by sustainable transport modes
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework 2024 and any relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The substantial harm to the Green Belt through inappropriateness and loss of openness, combined with harm to character and appearance and unsustainable location, is not clearly outweighed by the modest benefits of a single dwelling, so very special circumstances do not exist.
The substantial harm to the Green Belt (by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness), harm to character and appearance, and unsustainable location are not clearly outweighed by the modest benefits of housing provision and economic benefits; the Green Belt designation provides a strong reason for refusal that prevents the tilted balance from applying
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy S1Policy INF1Policy CA-GA1Policy EN1Policy EN4Policy EN8Policy H1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 84Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 155Paragraph 232Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mole Valley District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed20 October 20266013764Priory Lodge, River Lane, Leatherhead, KT22 0AU
- Dismissed19 October 20266011465Land to the South-East of Yarm Way, Leatherhead, KT22 8RQ
- Dismissed16 October 20266010203High Bank,, Mill Hill Lane, Betchworth, RH3 7LS
- Dismissed16 September 20266008528Henhurst Lodge, Beare Green Road, Beare Green, RH5 4PX
- Allowed11 September 20266012763Fourays, Horsham Road, Capel, Dorking, RH5 5LF
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®