Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 June 20253362096

Land Adj to William Lovel School/Stickney Meadows,, Stickney, PE22 8AF

Planning appeal 3362096 at Land Adj to William Lovel School/Stickney Meadows,, Stickney, PE22 8AF (East Lindsey District Council) was dismissed on 5 June 2025 by Inspector Hartley S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal accords with development plan policies relating to the location of residential development in the area.

in outline for the erection of 46 dwellings (with means of access and site layout to be considered)

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Hartley S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal accords with development plan policies relating to the location of residential development in the area
  • the effect of the proposal upon the character and appearance of the area
  • whether a planning obligation is necessary and deliverable in order to mitigate the impacts of the development proposal

What decided it

The lack of an enforceable mechanism for the delivery of affordable housing as required by policy SP7 of the Core Strategy outweighed the positive aspects of the proposal and the engagement of the tilted balance.

The benefits of housing delivery and accordance with policies SP3 and SP10, together with the engagement of the tilted balance due to lack of five-year housing land supply, were outweighed by the failure to secure affordable housing through a completed planning obligation.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
SP1SP3SP7SP10SP28
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

7 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in East Lindsey

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed6 October 20266012592
    Corner House, Planting Side, Little Cawthorpe, LN11 8NS
  2. Dismissed5 October 20266005383
    Pavement O/S 55-59 Lumley Road, Skegness, PE25 3LT
  3. Dismissed5 October 20266005382
    Pavement O/S 55-59 Lumley Road, Skegness, PE25 3LT
  4. Dismissed30 September 20266009106
    Land at Tuttle Farm, Lock Road, North Cotes, Grimsby, DN36 5UP
  5. Dismissed22 September 20266012364
    Ashcroft, Louth Road, Wragby, LN8 5PH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.