Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 November 20253362120

Development Site At Rear Of 148 To 172, High Street, Barnet, EN5 5XP

Planning appeal 3362120 at Development Site At Rear Of 148 To 172, High Street, Barnet, EN5 5XP (London Borough of Barnet) was dismissed on 11 November 2025 by Inspector Burley P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the appeal scheme would prejudice the delivery of planning permission 18/4700/FUL and the benefits secured through the associated section 106 agreement.

‘Outline application for the erection of a 4-storey building comprising 8 flats (first, second & third floor), affordable ground floor commercial (Class E), associated car parking and infrastructure with landscaping reserved’

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Burley P
Postcode
EN5 5XP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the appeal scheme would prejudice the delivery of planning permission 18/4700/FUL and the benefits secured through the associated section 106 agreement
  • whether the reduction in the amount of employment space proposed, when compared with the previously-approved scheme for this site, has been adequately justified
  • whether the appeal scheme would result in unacceptable highways impacts
  • whether suitable living conditions for the future residential occupiers of the development would be provided with regard to the amount of outdoor amenity space provided
  • the effect of the appeal scheme on the living conditions of 166-168 High Street with specific regard to privacy and overlooking

What decided it

The reduction in employment floorspace compared with the approved scheme has not been adequately justified, and the absence of evidence demonstrating sufficient private outdoor space for the proposed dwellings, taken together, outweigh the benefits of the scheme.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
BLP Policy HOU01BLP Policy ECY01BLP Policy ECY02BLP Policy TRC03BLP Policy CDH07BLP Policy CDH01BLP Policy TOW01

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

343 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Barnet

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed28 May 20266004245
    15 Glebe Crescent, London, NW4 1BT
  2. Dismissed1 May 20266003427
    188 The Vale, London, NW11 8SR
  3. Allowed30 April 20266001441
    5 Llanvanor Road, London, NW2 2AR
  4. Dismissed28 April 20266003357
    145 Cheviot Gardens, London, NW2 1QB
  5. Dismissed30 March 20266000941
    45 Holdenhurst Avenue, London, N12 0JA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.