Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 July 20253362576

Ground Floor Flat , 269 Brunswick Road, London, W5 1AJ

Planning appeal 3362576 at Ground Floor Flat , 269 Brunswick Road, London, W5 1AJ (London Borough of Ealing) was dismissed on 18 July 2025 by Inspector Teasdale N, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host property and surrounding area, including whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Brunswick Conservation Area.

front porch extension; alteration to front of property involving hard and soft landscaping; alteration to boundary wall

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Teasdale N
Postcode
W5 1AJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host property and surrounding area, including whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Brunswick Conservation Area
  • The effect of the proposed development on the road network's safety

What decided it

The proposed development would unacceptably harm the character and appearance of the Brunswick Conservation Area through the enclosure of the recessed porch and extensive hard surfacing with loss of traditional boundaries, with insufficient public benefits to offset this less than substantial harm to the designated heritage asset.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D3Policy D4Policy HC1Policy 7.4Policy 7CPolicy T4
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 212Paragraph 215Paragraph 12Paragraph 16Paragraph 9

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

409 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Ealing

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266013917
    94 Pitshanger Lane, Ealing, London, W5 1QX
  2. Notice upheld4 September 20263365332
    81 Ashness Gardens, Greenford, UB6 0RW
  3. Dismissed30 April 20266003619
    4 - 6 Ealing Road, Northolt, UB5 5HT
  4. Notice upheld2 April 20263367385
    19 Wedmore Road, Greenford, UB6 8SB
  5. Notice upheld2 April 20263367259
    17 Wedmore Road, Greenford, UB6 8SB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.