Planning appeal decision
Honey Orchard, Doverdale, Droitwich Spa, Worcestershire, WR9 0QB
Planning appeal 3363594 at Honey Orchard, Doverdale, Droitwich Spa, Worcestershire, WR9 0QB (Wychavon District Council) was allowed on 5 January 2026 by Inspector Nicholls H, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the location of the development would accord with local policies concerning development in the countryside.
change of use of land to a mixed use for the keeping of horses and as a residential caravan site for 3 Gypsy/Traveller families, with a total of 4 caravans including no more than 3 static caravans, together with the laying of hardstanding, widening of access, and erection of amenity building (part retrospective)
- Authority
- Wychavon District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Minor traveller and caravan pitches
- Inspector
- Nicholls H
- Postcode
- WR9 0QB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the location of the development would accord with local policies concerning development in the countryside
- the effects of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- the effects of the proposal on local amenity
- whether other considerations, including the general need for and supply of Gypsy sites, outweigh any harm identified, such as to justify the development
What decided it
The Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year supply of deliverable Gypsy and Traveller pitches engaged the tilted balance under NPPF paragraph 11(d), and the limited landscape/visual harm did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of the additional pitch provision.
The landscape and visual harms, which conflicted with SWDP25 but did not meet the higher SWDP17 threshold, were outweighed by the benefits of providing two further Traveller pitches to address the pitch supply shortfall, so the adverse impacts did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits under NPPF paragraph 11(d)
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- SWDP17SWDP25
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11
- Judgments
- Doncaster MBC v FSS & Angela Smith [2007]; S Cambs DC v SSCLG and Julie Brown [2008] EWCA Civ 1010
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Wychavon
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Planning permission granted16 May 20253358097Wickhamford Lane, Evesham, Worcs, WR11 7RW
- Allowed13 May 20253353366The Gables, Flash Lane, Saleway, Droitwich Spa, WR9 7JY
- Allowed20 March 2025334625047 Lower Cladswell Lane, Cookhill, Alcester, B49 5JY
- Dismissed16 August 20243340306Winkett's Yard, Land Between Kings Road and Northwick Road, Evesham, WR11 3AY
- Allowed20 July 20233276064Land to the North Side of The Nook, Tyrells Lane, Lower Bentley, Bromsgrove, B60 4HX
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®