Planning appeal decision
Land at Crown Lane Farm, Crown Lane, Lower Peover, Knutsford, WA16 9QB
Planning appeal 3364367 at Land at Crown Lane Farm, Crown Lane, Lower Peover, Knutsford, WA16 9QB (Cheshire West and Chester) was dismissed on 15 September 2025 by Inspector Major R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the appeal site is a suitable location for housing, having regard to the Council's spatial strategy, the relevant development plan policies and the proximity of facilities, services and sustainable modes of transport.
outline planning application for 12no. self-build/custom-build dwellings with associated access and supporting infrastructure. A Design Code and Plot Passports accompany this application. Matters of final appearance, landscaping, layout and scale will be confirmed with subsequent reserved matters applications for each plot
- Authority
- Cheshire West and Chester
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Major R
- Postcode
- WA16 9QB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the appeal site is a suitable location for housing, having regard to the Council's spatial strategy, the relevant development plan policies and the proximity of facilities, services and sustainable modes of transport
- the effect of the proposal on protected species, with particular regard to bats
- the effect of the proposal on the efficiency of the Jodrell Bank Radio Telescope
- whether a planning obligation is necessary in respect of matters relating to self-build; affordable housing; open space and education
What decided it
The cumulative harm from the unsustainable location, insufficient protected species information, impact on Jodrell Bank Radio Telescope efficiency, and failure to secure affordable housing significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of housing supply.
The adverse impacts from unsustainable location, development plan conflicts, protected species uncertainty, Jodrell Bank interference, and absence of affordable housing obligation significantly and demonstrably outweighed the moderate social and economic benefits of 12 dwellings, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy STRAT 1Policy STRAT 2Policy STRAT 8Policy STRAT 9Policy ENV4Policy SOC1Policy SOC6Policy DM12Policy DM19Policy DM35Policy DM44
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 58Paragraph 66Paragraph 83Paragraph 84Paragraph 91Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 129Paragraph 135Paragraph 139Paragraph 225
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Cheshire West and Chester
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed21 October 20266013998Holly Cottage, Post Office Lane, Norley, WA6 8NB
- Dismissed16 October 20266012795Bramley Corner Barn, Wood Lane, Tattenhall, CH3 9AD
- Dismissed6 October 20266011029Oaktree, Liverpool Road, Neston, CH64 3RQ
- Dismissed28 September 20266010642Land Adjacent 10 Wren Avenue, Sproston, Crewe, CW4 7LS
- Dismissed13 August 20266007749Durlston, Grove Road, Lea by Backford, Chester, CH1 6LG
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®