®Planning appeal decision
6 Addison Crescent, LONDON, W14 8JP
a replacement of double garage by a single storey side extension; new side additions at lower ground and ground floor levels. Extension of rear walls either side of the back addition at lower ground level and above. Roof extension. Repair and restoration of building’s exterior. Replacement of windows with slimline double-glazing and other minor amendments. Construction of single level basement comprising a pool, sauna, gym, car lift, garage and plant area
- Authority
- Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Perrins N
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the Holland Park Conservation Area
- the depth of proposed basement and whether its construction would adversely impact on the living conditions of neighbours
- the effect of the proposal on trees of amenity value
What decided it
The detailed design of windows on the proposed third floor and side elevations would cause unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the Holland Park Conservation Area and the group value of the historic building, with no public benefits to outweigh this less than substantial harm.
Framework references: 16
Plan policies cited: Policy CD1, Policy CD2, Policy CD4, Policy CD10, Policy CD11, Policy CD12, Policy CD13, Policy CS9, Policy CS11
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.