Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 August 20253364612

34 Pepys Close, Ickenham, London, UB10 8NY

the erection of part single storey, part two storey front extension, and a front porch, following demolition of existing attached garage. Conversion of the roof space into habitable rooms including a rear dormer, 4 x front facing roof lights and 1 x rear facin g roof light, and relocation of vehicular crossover

Authority
London Borough of Hillingdon
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Simms S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including the effect on the Ickenham Village Conservation Area.

What decided it

The proposal would cause less than substantial harm to the Ickenham Village Conservation Area through introducing uncharacteristic two-storey bulk and excessive width at the street frontage, which cannot be justified by the limited public benefits of additional housing capacity.

Framework references: 215

Plan policies cited: BE1, HE1, DMHB 4, DMHB 11, DMHB 12, DMHD 1, D3, HC1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.