Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice upheld23 June 20263364684

83 Freemans Lane, HAYES, UB3 2NJ

Without planning permission, the erection of a single storey rear extension ("the breach")

Authority
London Borough of Hillingdon
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Goldberg V

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the single storey rear extension on the character and appearance of the dwelling and the significance of the Conservation Area
  • the living conditions of the occupiers of 85 Freemans Lane in respect of daylight, sunlight and outlook

What decided it

The excessive width and scale of the extension creates harm to the character and appearance of the conservation area and to the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers that cannot be outweighed by the limited public benefit of additional accommodation.

the less than substantial harm to the significance of the conservation area and the harm to neighbouring living conditions outweighed the limited public benefit of additional living accommodation

Framework references: 212, 215

Plan policies cited: Policy HE1, Policy BE1, Policy DMHB12, Policy DMHB11, Policy DMHB4, Policy DMHB1, Policy DMHD1, Policy D4, Policy HC1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.