Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 October 20253364793

Whitboro Lodge at 261 Wild Hill, Teversal, Nottinghamshire, NG17 3JF

Planning appeal 3364793 at Whitboro Lodge at 261 Wild Hill, Teversal, Nottinghamshire, NG17 3JF (Ashfield District Council) was dismissed on 27 October 2025 by Inspector Duff N, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the openness, character and appearance of the area with particular regard to its location within the open countryside.

Proposed change of use of agricultural storage building to an Animal Feed Business (Class E) and associated land for access and car parking

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
retail · Change of use
Inspector
Duff N
Postcode
NG17 3JF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the openness, character and appearance of the area with particular regard to its location within the open countryside
  • The effect of the proposal on highway safety

What decided it

The development results in an unacceptable adverse effect on the openness, character and appearance of the countryside through intensification of use and associated infrastructure, contrary to Policy EV2 of the Ashfield Local Plan Review.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy EV2 of the Ashfield Local Plan Review (2002)Policy ST1 of the Ashfield Local Plan Review (2002)Policy NP1 of the Teversal, Stanton Hill and Skegby Neighbourhood PlanPolicy NP4 of the Teversal, Stanton Hill and Skegby Neighbourhood PlanPolicy NP2 of the Teversal, Stanton Hill and Skegby Neighbourhood Plan

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

23 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Ashfield

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed28 January 20266001120
    Land Between 124 and 142 Church Lane, Selston, Nottinghamshire, NG16 6FD
  2. Allowed3 November 20253366321
    Cedar House, Silverhill Lane, Teversal, Sutton-in-Ashfield, Nottinghamshire, NG17 3JJ
  3. Allowed19 June 20253356635
    Melbourne Farmhouse, 86 Inkerman Road, Selston, Nottinghamshire, NG16 6BN
  4. Dismissed20 January 20253347049
    Land Between 124 and 142, Church Lane, Selston, NG16 6FD
  5. Dismissed4 November 20243323952
    Hamilton Hill Farm, Cauldwell Road, Sutton in Ashfield , NG17 5LB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.