Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld13 April 20263364924

26 Crosland Edge, Meltham, Holmfirth, HD9 5RS

Planning appeal 3364924 at 26 Crosland Edge, Meltham, Holmfirth, HD9 5RS (Kirklees Metropolitan Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 13 April 2026 by Inspector Madge M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be an inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework.

the formation of parking area including associated retaining wall structures, engineering operations and works

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Madge M
Postcode
HD9 5RS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be an inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and wider locality
  • Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The engineering operation preserves Green Belt openness and does not conflict with Green Belt purposes, and any visual harm from the concrete retaining walls can be mitigated by a condition requiring natural stone facing.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
LP58LP24LP57
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 153Paragraph 154

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

23 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Kirklees

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed30 September 20266006003
    Land Adjacent, 837, Manchester Road, Linthwaite, Huddersfield, HD7 5NF
  2. Notice upheld16 July 20263300501
    31 Hare Park Avenue, Hightown, Liversedge, WF15 8DN
  3. Dismissed6 July 20266004239
    Stonecourt, Oldfield Road, Holmfirth, HD9 6NL
  4. Notice upheld25 June 20263368585
    86a Sheepridge, Huddersfield, HD2 1HG
  5. Notice upheld12 June 20263368547
    4 Rydal Grove, Roberttown, Liversedge, WF15 7DN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.