Planning appeal decision
49 High Street, Egham , Surrey, TW20 9EW
Planning appeal 3365910 at 49 High Street, Egham , Surrey, TW20 9EW (Runnymede Borough Council) was dismissed on 11 November 2025 by Inspector Goldberg V, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Egham Town Centre Conservation Area.
extensions and change of use of the existing building to provide a mixed-use scheme by enlarging the existing Class E commercial unit on the ground floor and to provide 8 Class C3 apartments through the change of use of the existing offices and extensions at first and second floor level, and a new third floor
- Authority
- Runnymede Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Goldberg V
- Postcode
- TW20 9EW
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Egham Town Centre Conservation Area
- the effect of the proposal on the significance of the Grade II Listed Literary Institute and Red Lion Pub and the Non-Designated Heritage Asset known as Old Bank
- whether the proposed development would be suitably located in relation to flood risk and whether it would increase flood risk
- the effect of the proposal on protected species and biodiversity
What decided it
The less than substantial harm to the conservation area and the settings of the listed buildings, combined with the failure to apply the Sequential Test for flood risk, could not be outweighed by the public benefits of housing delivery, particularly given the statutory duties to preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the conservation area and the settings of listed buildings.
The public benefits of housing delivery (eight dwellings) and commercial floorspace were weighed against the less than substantial harm to the conservation area and the settings of listed buildings; the statutory duties under Sections 66 and 72 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 were given considerable importance and weight, and the public benefits were found insufficient to outweigh the heritage harm.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy EE1Policy EE3Policy EE4Policy EE5Policy EE8Policy EE9Policy EE13Policy SD7
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 62Paragraph 205Paragraph 208
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Runnymede Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed29 October 202660121831-3 Part First Floor, New Haw Road, Addlestone, KT15 2BZ
- Dismissed29 October 20266006748St Merryns Copse, Chobham Road, Ottershaw, KT16 0QE
- decided12 October 20266007528Land Known to the West of 203-221 New Haw Road, Addlestone, KT15 2DP
- Dismissed12 October 20266006766Land to the West of, 203 - 221 New Haw Road, Addlestone, KT15 2DP
- Allowed8 October 2026601454812 Caxton Avenue, Addlestone, KT15 1LJ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®