Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 November 20253365910

49 High Street, Egham , Surrey, TW20 9EW

extensions and change of use of the existing building to provide a mixed-use scheme by enlarging the existing Class E commercial unit on the ground floor and to provide 8 Class C3 apartments through the change of use of the existing offices and extensions at first and second floor level, and a new third floor

Authority
Runnymede Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Goldberg V

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Egham Town Centre Conservation Area
  • the effect of the proposal on the significance of the Grade II Listed Literary Institute and Red Lion Pub and the Non-Designated Heritage Asset known as Old Bank
  • whether the proposed development would be suitably located in relation to flood risk and whether it would increase flood risk
  • the effect of the proposal on protected species and biodiversity

What decided it

The less than substantial harm to the conservation area and the settings of the listed buildings, combined with the failure to apply the Sequential Test for flood risk, could not be outweighed by the public benefits of housing delivery, particularly given the statutory duties to preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the conservation area and the settings of listed buildings.

The public benefits of housing delivery (eight dwellings) and commercial floorspace were weighed against the less than substantial harm to the conservation area and the settings of listed buildings; the statutory duties under Sections 66 and 72 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 were given considerable importance and weight, and the public benefits were found insufficient to outweigh the heritage harm.

Framework references: 11, 62, 205, 208

Plan policies cited: Policy EE1, Policy EE3, Policy EE4, Policy EE5, Policy EE8, Policy EE9, Policy EE13, Policy SD7

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.