Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 December 20253366290

Happy Paddocks Farm , Stan Hill, Charlwood, Surrey, RH6 0ES

Planning appeal 3366290 at Happy Paddocks Farm , Stan Hill, Charlwood, Surrey, RH6 0ES (Mole Valley District Council) was dismissed on 22 December 2025 by Inspector Housden C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt.

the demolition of an existing detached house and erection of a replacement 3 bedroom detached house, together with the change of use of agricultural land to facilitate the repositioning of the house and to provide residential curtilage and parking area

Authority
Mole Valley District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Housden C
Postcode
RH6 0ES

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • the effect on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the proposal would comply with the Nationally Described Space Standards (NDSS)
  • whether adequate refuse collection provisions would be provided
  • if the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal is inappropriate Green Belt development that would cause moderate harm to openness and considerable harm to character and appearance, with no very special circumstances to justify it.

The substantial weight given to harm to the Green Belt and the considerable harm to character and appearance were not outweighed by any other considerations, and very special circumstances do not exist.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy EN1Policy EN4Policy H10
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155
Judgments
Mansell v Tonbridge and Malling BC & others [2017] EWCA Civ 1314; Zurich Assurance Ltd (t/a Threadneedle Property Investments) v North Lincolnshire Council [2012] EWHC 3708 (Admin)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

59 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Mole Valley District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed20 October 20266013764
    Priory Lodge, River Lane, Leatherhead, KT22 0AU
  2. Dismissed19 October 20266011465
    Land to the South-East of Yarm Way, Leatherhead, KT22 8RQ
  3. Dismissed16 September 20266008528
    Henhurst Lodge, Beare Green Road, Beare Green, RH5 4PX
  4. Allowed11 September 20266012763
    Fourays, Horsham Road, Capel, Dorking, RH5 5LF
  5. Dismissed9 September 20266005433
    Land Opposite Manor House,, Headley, Headley Common, KT18 6NA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.