Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 November 20253366324

5 Crowland Avenue, HAYES, UB3 4JN

an “Erection of a single storey rear extension, and a first floor rear extension

Authority
London Borough of Hillingdon
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Manley N

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host property and the wider area

What decided it

The cumulative scale and massing of the proposed extensions, when combined with existing alterations, would result in a visually dominant form that would unacceptably harm the character and appearance of the host property and the wider street scene, conflicting with local plan policies requiring development to be subordinate and respect the design of the original house.

Plan policies cited: Policy BE1 of the Hillingdon Local Plan: Part One – Strategic Policies (Adopted 2012), Policy DMHD1 of the Hillingdon Local Plan: Part Two – Development Management Policies (Adopted 2020), Policy DMHB11 of the Hillingdon Local Plan: Part Two – Development Management Policies (Adopted 2020), Policy DMHB12 of the Hillingdon Local Plan: Part Two – Development Management Policies (Adopted 2020)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.