Planning appeal decision
26 Mount Pleasant, Ruislip, HA4 9HG
described in the application form as follows: “Hip-to-gable roof extensions, rear dormer and alteration of first floor hipped roof to flat roof”
- Authority
- London Borough of Hillingdon
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Shrimplin R
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host building and its surroundings
- Whether the scheme would provide satisfactory living conditions for occupiers of the proposed new residential accommodation in terms of outlook
What decided it
The harmful effect on the character and appearance of the host building and its surroundings caused by the clumsy and awkward design of the extensions and alterations outweighed the benefits of the additional residential accommodation.
Framework references: 12
Plan policies cited: D3, D4, D6, BE1, DMHB 11, DMHD 1
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®