Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed31 July 20253366468

26 Mount Pleasant, Ruislip, HA4 9HG

described in the application form as follows: “Hip-to-gable roof extensions, rear dormer and alteration of first floor hipped roof to flat roof”

Authority
London Borough of Hillingdon
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Shrimplin R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host building and its surroundings
  • Whether the scheme would provide satisfactory living conditions for occupiers of the proposed new residential accommodation in terms of outlook

What decided it

The harmful effect on the character and appearance of the host building and its surroundings caused by the clumsy and awkward design of the extensions and alterations outweighed the benefits of the additional residential accommodation.

Framework references: 12

Plan policies cited: D3, D4, D6, BE1, DMHB 11, DMHD 1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.