Planning appeal decision
Hillside Farm, Cudworth Lane, Newdigate, Surrey, RH5 5BH
Planning appeal 3367924 at Hillside Farm, Cudworth Lane, Newdigate, Surrey, RH5 5BH (Mole Valley District Council) was dismissed on 28 November 2025 by Inspector Heppell J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies, with particular reference to whether or not the site comprises grey belt and/or previously developed land (PDL), the accessibility of the site to services and facilities, the need for the development, and its effect on openness.
demolition of existing buildings and erection of detached dwelling with associated garage, landscaping and access
- Authority
- Mole Valley District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Heppell J
- Postcode
- RH5 5BH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies, with particular reference to whether or not the site comprises grey belt and/or previously developed land (PDL), the accessibility of the site to services and facilities, the need for the development, and its effect on openness
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal fails to meet the criteria in paragraph 155 of the Framework (grey belt exception) because it does not satisfy the demonstrable unmet need test and is not in a sustainable location, and would cause substantial harm to openness, such that very special circumstances do not exist to justify inappropriate Green Belt development.
The substantial harm to openness and significant harm to character and appearance, together with the unsustainable location and conflict with development plan policies, were not outweighed by the benefits of housing provision, self-build potential, removal of agricultural buildings, economic benefits and ecological enhancements.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy EN1Policy EN4Policy EN8Policy S1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 78Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 143Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 232
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mole Valley District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed20 October 20266013764Priory Lodge, River Lane, Leatherhead, KT22 0AU
- Dismissed19 October 20266011465Land to the South-East of Yarm Way, Leatherhead, KT22 8RQ
- Dismissed16 September 20266008528Henhurst Lodge, Beare Green Road, Beare Green, RH5 4PX
- Allowed11 September 20266012763Fourays, Horsham Road, Capel, Dorking, RH5 5LF
- Dismissed9 September 20266005433Land Opposite Manor House,, Headley, Headley Common, KT18 6NA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®