Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 October 20253367989

Camellia Cottage, Chillies Lane, High Hurstwood, Uckfield, TN22 4AB

the erection of new dwelling

Authority
Wealden District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Pearce J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the site is a suitable location for the proposed development, having regard to development plan policy and accessibility to services and facilities
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including whether the proposal would conserve and enhance the landscape, scenic and natural beauty of the High Weald National Landscape
  • the effect of the proposed development on the significance of the non-designated heritage asset
  • the effect of the proposed development on highway safety
  • the effect of the proposed development on ecology, with regard to protected species
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupants of Camellia Cottage and Quercus, with regard to outlook

What decided it

The site's unsuitability as a location for housing due to its position outside development boundaries, poor accessibility to services and facilities, and the significant harms to landscape character, heritage significance, highway safety and ecology collectively outweighed the limited housing benefits in circumstances where the tilted balance applied.

The adverse impacts of the proposal—comprising unsuitability of location, harm to character and appearance of the National Landscape, harm to the non-designated heritage asset, undemonstrated highway safety, and unresolved ecology concerns—significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited benefits of delivering a single dwelling and associated social and economic benefits, when assessed against the policies of the Framework as a whole.

Framework references: 11, 83, 189, 216

Plan policies cited: Policy GD2, Policy DC17, Policy EN1, Policy EN6, Policy EN27, Policy TR3, Policy WSC12, Policy WCS6, Policy WCS12, Policy WCS14, Spatial Planning Objective SPO1, Spatial Planning Objective SPO2, Spatial Planning Objective SPO7, Spatial Planning Objective SPO13

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.