Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 October 20253367989

Camellia Cottage, Chillies Lane, High Hurstwood, Uckfield, TN22 4AB

Planning appeal 3367989 at Camellia Cottage, Chillies Lane, High Hurstwood, Uckfield, TN22 4AB (Wealden District Council) was dismissed on 7 October 2025 by Inspector Pearce J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site is a suitable location for the proposed development, having regard to development plan policy and accessibility to services and facilities.

the erection of new dwelling

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Pearce J
Postcode
TN22 4AB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the site is a suitable location for the proposed development, having regard to development plan policy and accessibility to services and facilities
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including whether the proposal would conserve and enhance the landscape, scenic and natural beauty of the High Weald National Landscape
  • the effect of the proposed development on the significance of the non-designated heritage asset
  • the effect of the proposed development on highway safety
  • the effect of the proposed development on ecology, with regard to protected species
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupants of Camellia Cottage and Quercus, with regard to outlook

What decided it

The site's unsuitability as a location for housing due to its position outside development boundaries, poor accessibility to services and facilities, and the significant harms to landscape character, heritage significance, highway safety and ecology collectively outweighed the limited housing benefits in circumstances where the tilted balance applied.

The adverse impacts of the proposal—comprising unsuitability of location, harm to character and appearance of the National Landscape, harm to the non-designated heritage asset, undemonstrated highway safety, and unresolved ecology concerns—significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited benefits of delivering a single dwelling and associated social and economic benefits, when assessed against the policies of the Framework as a whole.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy GD2Policy DC17Policy EN1Policy EN6Policy EN27Policy TR3Policy WSC12Policy WCS6Policy WCS12Policy WCS14Spatial Planning Objective SPO1Spatial Planning Objective SPO2Spatial Planning Objective SPO7Spatial Planning Objective SPO13
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 83Paragraph 189Paragraph 216

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

6 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Wealden District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed25 September 20266009517
    Fairfield Cottage, Cross In Hand Road, Heathfield, TN21 0SN
  2. Dismissed14 April 20266003970
    Little Warren Barn, The Warren, Crowborough, East Sussex, TN6 1UB
  3. Dismissed27 January 20263370047
    Hedera Cottage North Street, Punnetts Town, Heathfield, TN21 9DT
  4. Dismissed22 January 20263372124
    Birch Holt, Marlpits Lane, Ninfield, East Sussex, TN33 9LD
  5. Allowed31 December 20253366478
    Snatchells Farm, Cross In Hand Road, Heathfield, TN21 0LS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.