Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed23 September 20253367994

686A Romford Road, London, London Borough of Newham, E12 5AJ

Planning appeal 3367994 at 686A Romford Road, London, London Borough of Newham, E12 5AJ (London Borough of Newham) was dismissed on 23 September 2025 by Inspector Deane G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the vitality and viability of Newham's town and local centres.

to divide existing E(a) retail unit into two E(a) retail units, the installation of a new shop front facing First Avenue, new door for existing retail unit facing First Avenue

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
retail · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Deane G
Postcode
E12 5AJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the vitality and viability of Newham's town and local centres
  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the local area

What decided it

The proposal would introduce a visually prominent commercial shopfront to a predominantly residential street (First Avenue), creating an incongruous and obtrusive appearance that would significantly harm local character and appearance, combined with harm to town centre vitality by locating retail development outside designated centres.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy J2Policy J1Policy INF5Policy S1Policy SP6Policy SP7Policy S6Policy SP1Policy SP3Policy SP8The London Plan Policy SD6The London Plan Policy SD7The London Plan Policy E9The London Plan Policy D1The London Plan Policy D3The London Plan Policy D4The London Plan Policy D8

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

573 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Newham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed26 October 20266010788
    Costa Coffee, 45 Woodgrange Road, Forest Gate, E7 8BA
  2. Allowed22 October 20266012761
    Land Outside 341 to 353, High Street, Stratford, E15 4QZ
  3. Dismissed21 October 20266014267
    Rear Of 90 Cumberland Road, Plaistow, London, E13 8LQ
  4. Dismissed2 October 20266011081
    239 Barking Road, London, E6 1LB
  5. Allowed18 September 20266011432
    7 Grayling Close, Canning Town, London, E16 4PB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.