Planning appeal decision
Weybridge Bowling Club, 19 Springfield Lane, Weybridge, Surrey, KT13 8AW
Planning appeal 3368457 at Weybridge Bowling Club, 19 Springfield Lane, Weybridge, Surrey, KT13 8AW (Elmbridge Borough Council) was dismissed on 16 January 2026 by Inspector Rawle S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area including on the significance of a heritage asset.
the erection of a new three storey 44 bed care home in C2 use with associated car parking, landscaping and access
- Authority
- Elmbridge Borough Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- community-institutional · Major general industry/storage/warehousing
- Inspector
- Rawle S
- Postcode
- KT13 8AW
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area including on the significance of a heritage asset
- The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of 5-15 Springfield Lane and Henbury Place with particular reference to outlook, sunlight, daylight and noise and disturbance
- Whether adequate information has been provided to demonstrate whether or not the proposal would have an unacceptable impact on highway safety
- Whether there is a demonstrable need for the proposed C2 accommodation at the appeal site
- Whether or not it has been adequately demonstrated that the proposed development would satisfy the statutory requirement in relation to Biodiversity Net Gain
What decided it
The significant and cumulative harm to character and appearance, heritage significance, living conditions of Henbury Place residents, and unresolved highway safety concerns outweighed the benefits of housing supply and specialist accommodation provision.
The significant benefits of housing supply, specialist accommodation provision, economic and social benefits, and biodiversity enhancements were outweighed by significant harm to character and appearance, moderate harm to heritage asset significance, considerable weight given to unresolved highway safety concerns, and significant harm to living conditions of Henbury Place residents.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS17Policy DM2Policy DM5Policy DM7Policy CS25Policy CS20Policy DM9
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Elmbridge Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed6 October 20266010653Land Rear Of 12-14 New Road, Esher, KT10 9PG
- Allowed3 September 20266007869Wild Flowers, Wren's Hill, Oxshott, KT22 0HN
- Allowed10 August 2026600603331 Stevens Lane, Claygate, Esher, KT10 0TD
- Allowed9 July 202660055521a Carmalt Gardens, Hersham, KT12 5HQ
- Allowed29 May 202660058508-14 Oatlands Drive, Weybridge, Surrey, KT13 9JL
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®