Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 August 20253368605

Hillcrest Pyle Hill, WOKING, GU22 0SR

Authority
Woking Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Ellis G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • if inappropriate development, the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • if the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the 'very special circumstances' which would be necessary to justify it

What decided it

The disproportionate scale of the extensions (205-211.8% increase in volume) exceeds the policy threshold and constitutes inappropriate Green Belt development that is not justified by very special circumstances.

The harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and limited harm to openness, to which substantial weight was attached, was not clearly outweighed by the moderate weight given to the appellant's personal health and mobility circumstances and other considerations such as landscaping and energy efficiency benefits.

Framework references: 154, 154C, 155

Plan policies cited: CS6, DM13

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.