Planning appeal decision
Hillcrest Pyle Hill, WOKING, GU22 0SR
- Authority
- Woking Borough Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Ellis G
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
- if inappropriate development, the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- if the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the 'very special circumstances' which would be necessary to justify it
What decided it
The disproportionate scale of the extensions (205-211.8% increase in volume) exceeds the policy threshold and constitutes inappropriate Green Belt development that is not justified by very special circumstances.
The harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and limited harm to openness, to which substantial weight was attached, was not clearly outweighed by the moderate weight given to the appellant's personal health and mobility circumstances and other considerations such as landscaping and energy efficiency benefits.
Framework references: 154, 154C, 155
Plan policies cited: CS6, DM13
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®