Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed3 November 20253368668

Building to Rear of 68 Court Road, Kingswood, BS15 9QG

Planning appeal 3368668 at Building to Rear of 68 Court Road, Kingswood, BS15 9QG (South Gloucestershire Council) was allowed on 3 November 2025 by Inspector Barton P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupants of nearby residential properties, with particular reference to privacy and the potential for noise and disturbance.

change of use of ancillary annexe to a commercial holiday let

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Change of use
Inspector
Barton P
Postcode
BS15 9QG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupants of nearby residential properties, with particular reference to privacy and the potential for noise and disturbance
  • highway safety, with particular regard to the visibility at the access to Claypool Road and the provision of parking
  • the character and appearance of the area, having particular reference to on-street parking and the provision of a commercial holiday let in this location

What decided it

The proposed holiday let would generate similar levels of activity and parking demand to the already-approved annexe use and would be occupied in a similarly low-key manner, resulting in no material difference to living conditions, highway safety, or character and appearance.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS1Policy CS8Policy CS9Policy PSP8Policy PSP11Policy PSP38

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

109 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in South Gloucestershire Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed13 October 20266011871
    49 Court Road, Kingswood, Bristol, BS15 9QG
  2. Allowed25 August 20266009167
    27 Gloucester Road North, Filton, BS7 0SQ
  3. Allowed6 August 20266009073
    Land Associated With 51 Frampton End Road, Frampton Cotterell, Bristol, BS36 2LY
  4. Dismissed29 July 20266006817
    Wisteria View, Gloucester Road, Cold Ashton, SN14 8LB
  5. Allowed9 July 20266008703
    Land at 42 Teewell Hill, Staple Hill, Bristol, BS16 5PD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.