Planning appeal decision
The Plough House , 276 London Road, Biggleswade, SG18 9TB
Planning appeal 3368820 at The Plough House , 276 London Road, Biggleswade, SG18 9TB (Central Bedfordshire) was allowed on 18 November 2025 by Inspector Smith J, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the development is suitably located having regard to relevant policies in the development plan and access to services and facilities.
‘Demolition of 2 existing buildings and removal of pre -existing mobile home. Erection of acoustic sound barrier fence. Change of use of land for the creation of 4 Gypsy/Traveller Pitches, comprising the siting of 4 static caravans (net 3) and 4 touring caravans alongside the erection of 1 combined dayroom for use by family members (Part Retrospective)
- Authority
- Central Bedfordshire
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Minor traveller and caravan pitches
- Inspector
- Smith J
- Postcode
- SG18 9TB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the development is suitably located having regard to relevant policies in the development plan and access to services and facilities
- the effect on the character and appearance of the area
- whether suitable living conditions would be provided for future occupiers, having regard to road noise, including the proposed mitigation measures, and the availability of suitable outdoor amenity space for occupiers of the existing dwelling
What decided it
The acknowledged unmet need and shortfall in supply of Gypsy and Traveller sites, engaging the presumption in favour of sustainable development under paragraph 11d, outweighed the limited identified harms.
The modest harm from loss of amenity space for the existing dwelling and the limited additional weight from intentional unauthorised development were outweighed by the significant benefits of delivering four Gypsy/Traveller pitches on previously developed land to meet an acknowledged unmet need, such that adverse impacts did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits under paragraph 11d of the Framework.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP7Policy BSP1Policy H7Policy BTM1Policy BPD1Policy HQ1Policy EE5Policy CC8Policy EE2Policy SP8
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 115
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Central Bedfordshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed15 October 20266009682Land West Of Hurricane Avenue, Lower Stondon, SG16 6NW
- Dismissed9 October 2026601067023A High Street North, Dunstable, LU6 1HX
- Allowed16 June 2026600456225 Rectory Lane,, Houghton Conquest,, MK45 3LD
- Dismissed22 April 20263373674Land South of Hutchinson Rise, Potton, Sandy, Bedfordshire, SG19 2DZ
- Dismissed18 March 20263373108The White Horse Mill Road, Husborne Crawley, MK43 0XE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®