Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld19 December 20253369001

Land at the Paddock, Compton, Guildford, GU3 1AD

Planning appeal 3369001 at Land at the Paddock, Compton, Guildford, GU3 1AD (Guildford Borough Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 19 December 2025 by Inspector Dyer S, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the use of the land for a mixed use of residential and equestrian use is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies, including: Whether the appeal site is Previously Developed Land (PDL); Whether the appeal site is grey belt land with particular reference to whether the effect of the development on Surrey Hills National Landscape or the Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area provide a strong reason for refusing or restricting the development.

change of use of land to a mixed use of residential and equestrian comprising the siting of a mobile home for Gypsies/Travellers, the erection of an equestrian building containing 3 stables and fencing and creation of hardstanding

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Hearing
Development
caravan-gypsy · Change of use
Inspector
Dyer S
Postcode
GU3 1AD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the use of the land for a mixed use of residential and equestrian use is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies, including: Whether the appeal site is Previously Developed Land (PDL); Whether the appeal site is grey belt land with particular reference to whether the effect of the development on Surrey Hills National Landscape or the Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area provide a strong reason for refusing or restricting the development
  • The effect of the development on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the site and the surrounding area
  • Whether the development is suitably located having regard to relevant development plan policies concerning sustainable transport for new developments
  • Whether the development provides sufficient grazing and exercise areas for the welfare of two horses
  • Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development

What decided it

The cumulative Green Belt, National Landscape and animal welfare harms were not clearly outweighed by the personal circumstances, unmet gypsy and traveller need and lack of alternative sites, so very special circumstances were not established.

Substantial harm from inappropriate Green Belt development, loss of openness, harm to the Surrey Hills National Landscape and inadequate horse welfare provision, together with limited harm to character/appearance and sustainable transport, was not clearly outweighed by the significant weight attached to unmet gypsy and traveller need, the shortfall in site supply, moderate weight for lack of alternatives, and significant weight for personal circumstances/best interests of the children.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy P2Policy P1Policy P5Policy D1Policy D4Policy ID3Policy E10Policy H1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 143Paragraph 155

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

31 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Guildford Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. decided16 October 20266010712
    9 Baldwin Crescent, Guildford, GU4 7XW
  2. Allowed15 October 20266008529
    Shortland Farm, Guildford Road, Ash, GU12 6DF
  3. Allowed14 October 20266009751
    Land South of Green Lane, West Horsley, GU23 6PQ
  4. Dismissed6 October 20266009810
    Hogs Back Farm Yard, Monkshatch, Compton, GU3 1DL
  5. Allowed5 October 20266012736
    The Cottage, Blanket Mill Farm, Goose Rye Road, Worplesdon, Guildford, GU3 3RQ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.