Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld19 December 20253369001

Land at the Paddock, Compton, Guildford, GU3 1AD

change of use of land to a mixed use of residential and equestrian comprising the siting of a mobile home for Gypsies/Travellers, the erection of an equestrian building containing 3 stables and fencing and creation of hardstanding

Authority
Guildford Borough Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Hearing
Development
caravan-gypsy · Change of use
Inspector
Dyer S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the use of the land for a mixed use of residential and equestrian use is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies, including: Whether the appeal site is Previously Developed Land (PDL); Whether the appeal site is grey belt land with particular reference to whether the effect of the development on Surrey Hills National Landscape or the Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area provide a strong reason for refusing or restricting the development
  • The effect of the development on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the site and the surrounding area
  • Whether the development is suitably located having regard to relevant development plan policies concerning sustainable transport for new developments
  • Whether the development provides sufficient grazing and exercise areas for the welfare of two horses
  • Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development

What decided it

The cumulative Green Belt, National Landscape and animal welfare harms were not clearly outweighed by the personal circumstances, unmet gypsy and traveller need and lack of alternative sites, so very special circumstances were not established.

Substantial harm from inappropriate Green Belt development, loss of openness, harm to the Surrey Hills National Landscape and inadequate horse welfare provision, together with limited harm to character/appearance and sustainable transport, was not clearly outweighed by the significant weight attached to unmet gypsy and traveller need, the shortfall in site supply, moderate weight for lack of alternatives, and significant weight for personal circumstances/best interests of the children.

Framework references: 143, 155

Plan policies cited: Policy P2, Policy P1, Policy P5, Policy D1, Policy D4, Policy ID3, Policy E10, Policy H1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.