Planning appeal decision
Land at the Paddock, Compton, Guildford, GU3 1AD
Planning appeal 3369001 at Land at the Paddock, Compton, Guildford, GU3 1AD (Guildford Borough Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 19 December 2025 by Inspector Dyer S, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the use of the land for a mixed use of residential and equestrian use is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies, including: Whether the appeal site is Previously Developed Land (PDL); Whether the appeal site is grey belt land with particular reference to whether the effect of the development on Surrey Hills National Landscape or the Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area provide a strong reason for refusing or restricting the development.
change of use of land to a mixed use of residential and equestrian comprising the siting of a mobile home for Gypsies/Travellers, the erection of an equestrian building containing 3 stables and fencing and creation of hardstanding
- Authority
- Guildford Borough Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Change of use
- Inspector
- Dyer S
- Postcode
- GU3 1AD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the use of the land for a mixed use of residential and equestrian use is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies, including: Whether the appeal site is Previously Developed Land (PDL); Whether the appeal site is grey belt land with particular reference to whether the effect of the development on Surrey Hills National Landscape or the Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area provide a strong reason for refusing or restricting the development
- The effect of the development on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
- The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the site and the surrounding area
- Whether the development is suitably located having regard to relevant development plan policies concerning sustainable transport for new developments
- Whether the development provides sufficient grazing and exercise areas for the welfare of two horses
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development
What decided it
The cumulative Green Belt, National Landscape and animal welfare harms were not clearly outweighed by the personal circumstances, unmet gypsy and traveller need and lack of alternative sites, so very special circumstances were not established.
Substantial harm from inappropriate Green Belt development, loss of openness, harm to the Surrey Hills National Landscape and inadequate horse welfare provision, together with limited harm to character/appearance and sustainable transport, was not clearly outweighed by the significant weight attached to unmet gypsy and traveller need, the shortfall in site supply, moderate weight for lack of alternatives, and significant weight for personal circumstances/best interests of the children.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy P2Policy P1Policy P5Policy D1Policy D4Policy ID3Policy E10Policy H1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 143Paragraph 155
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Guildford Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- decided16 October 202660107129 Baldwin Crescent, Guildford, GU4 7XW
- Allowed15 October 20266008529Shortland Farm, Guildford Road, Ash, GU12 6DF
- Allowed14 October 20266009751Land South of Green Lane, West Horsley, GU23 6PQ
- Dismissed6 October 20266009810Hogs Back Farm Yard, Monkshatch, Compton, GU3 1DL
- Allowed5 October 20266012736The Cottage, Blanket Mill Farm, Goose Rye Road, Worplesdon, Guildford, GU3 3RQ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®