Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld22 April 20263369112

392 City Road, Sheffield, S2 1GA

Planning appeal 3369112 at 392 City Road, Sheffield, S2 1GA (Sheffield City Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 22 April 2026 by Inspector Griffin E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development which consists of a front dormer and rear extension upon the character and appearance of the appeal property and the surrounding area.

‘Without planning permission, the carrying out of operational development being the construction of a front dormer window and two -storey rear extension, shown in the Photographs in Appendix 1 and 2 to this Notice

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Griffin E
Postcode
S2 1GA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development which consists of a front dormer and rear extension upon the character and appearance of the appeal property and the surrounding area
  • The effect of the rear extension upon the living conditions of occupiers of 394 City Road with particular regard to outlook

What decided it

The development causes unacceptable harm to character and appearance and to neighbouring amenity, conflicting with the development plan, and no material considerations justify approval.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
BE5H14CS74
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 135

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

52 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Sheffield City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Notice varied and upheld17 September 20263378304
    Step Rehabilitation, 30 Troutbeck Road, Sheffield, S7 2QA
  2. Notice varied and upheld7 September 20263376754
    Land at the Junction of Spital Street, Sorby Street, And Carlisle Street,, Sheffield, S4 7LJ
  3. Notice varied and upheld7 September 20263374622
    Land At Rear Of 551-561 Attercliffe Road, Kimberley Street, Sheffield, S9 3RA
  4. Split Decision23 July 20263377264
    Samehill Farm and Land to East , Hagg Lane, Sheffield, S10 5PX
  5. Notice varied and upheld20 July 20263361302
    Land to North Side of Rotherham Road, Beighton, Sheffield, S20 1AG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.