Planning appeal decision
Rolllings Ley Fancott Luton Road , Toddington, Dunstable, LU5 6HT
Planning appeal 3370046 at Rolllings Ley Fancott Luton Road , Toddington, Dunstable, LU5 6HT (Central Bedfordshire) was dismissed on 11 November 2025 by Inspector Dyer I, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies, including any relevant effects on the openness of the Green Belt.
rear, side and roof increase for annex building
- Authority
- Central Bedfordshire
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Dyer I
- Postcode
- LU5 6HT
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies, including any relevant effects on the openness of the Green Belt
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the site and the surrounding area
- Whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal would constitute a disproportionate extension to the original building that would substantially reduce the openness of the Green Belt in spatial terms, and the limited benefits (accommodation for elderly relatives and minor construction employment) did not amount to very special circumstances sufficient to justify this inappropriate development.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP4Policy SP7Policy HQ1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 154
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Central Bedfordshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed15 September 20266007334Hillcrest, Chalton, Luton, LU4 9UB
- Allowed4 September 202660072022 Park Farm, Park Road, Westoning, MK45 5LA
- Dismissed7 August 20266007254Wheatsheaf Barn, Mount Pleasant, Aspley Guise, MK178JZ
- Dismissed10 July 20266005439263 Sharpenhoe Road, Streatley, LU3 3PP
- Dismissed8 July 20266007697142 Sharpenhoe Road, Streatley, Luton, LU3 3PS
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®