Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 December 20253371103

Land adj to Granary Cottage, London Road, Forest Row, RH18 5EE

1 self-build detached dwelling and associated infrastructure

Authority
Wealden District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Goldberg V

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal is appropriate in the countryside having regard to the Council's spatial strategy
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, having particular regard to the effect on the High Weald National Landscape

What decided it

The substantial harm to the High Weald National Landscape arising from the introduction of a large, elevated, visually intrusive dwelling on a prominent undeveloped plot clearly outweighed the benefits of self-build housing delivery and modest housing supply contribution.

The harm from conflict with spatial strategy (limited weight) and substantial harm to the National Landscape (great weight) clearly outweighed the significant weight given to self-build housing provision and the modest weight given to housing supply contribution, resulting in dismissal.

Framework references: 61, 73

Plan policies cited: Policy EN1, Policy GD2, Policy DC17, Policy EN6, Policy WCS14

Judgments cited: Suffolk Coastal District Council v Hopkins Homes Ltd and Richborough Estates Partnership LLP v Chesire East Borough Council [2017] UKSC 37; Hallam Land Management Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2018] EWCA Civ 1808; North Wiltshire District Council v SSE (1993) 65 P&CR 137; R (Davison) v Elmbridge BC [2019] EWHC 1409 (Admin)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.