Planning appeal decision
Land Adj to Granary Cottage, London Road, Forest Row, RH18 5EE
Planning appeal 3371103 at Land Adj to Granary Cottage, London Road, Forest Row, RH18 5EE (Wealden District Council) was dismissed on 3 December 2025 by Inspector Goldberg V, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal is appropriate in the countryside having regard to the Council's spatial strategy.
1 self-build detached dwelling and associated infrastructure
- Authority
- Wealden District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Goldberg V
- Postcode
- RH18 5EE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal is appropriate in the countryside having regard to the Council's spatial strategy
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, having particular regard to the effect on the High Weald National Landscape
What decided it
The substantial harm to the High Weald National Landscape arising from the introduction of a large, elevated, visually intrusive dwelling on a prominent undeveloped plot clearly outweighed the benefits of self-build housing delivery and modest housing supply contribution.
The harm from conflict with spatial strategy (limited weight) and substantial harm to the National Landscape (great weight) clearly outweighed the significant weight given to self-build housing provision and the modest weight given to housing supply contribution, resulting in dismissal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy EN1Policy GD2Policy DC17Policy EN6Policy WCS14
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 61Paragraph 73
- Judgments
- Suffolk Coastal District Council v Hopkins Homes Ltd and Richborough Estates Partnership LLP v Chesire East Borough Council [2017] UKSC 37; Hallam Land Management Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2018] EWCA Civ 1808; North Wiltshire District Council v SSE (1993) 65 P&CR 137; R (Davison) v Elmbridge BC [2019] EWHC 1409 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Wealden District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed25 September 20266009517Fairfield Cottage, Cross In Hand Road, Heathfield, TN21 0SN
- Dismissed14 April 20266003970Little Warren Barn, The Warren, Crowborough, East Sussex, TN6 1UB
- Dismissed27 January 20263370047Hedera Cottage North Street, Punnetts Town, Heathfield, TN21 9DT
- Dismissed22 January 20263372124Birch Holt, Marlpits Lane, Ninfield, East Sussex, TN33 9LD
- Allowed31 December 20253366478Snatchells Farm, Cross In Hand Road, Heathfield, TN21 0LS
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®