Planning appeal decision
Pitt Manor Romsey Road, Winchester, SO22 5PR
Planning appeal 3371345 at Pitt Manor Romsey Road, Winchester, SO22 5PR (Winchester City Council) was dismissed on 23 March 2026 by Inspector Thandi B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether affordable housing on-site is required to make the scheme acceptable in planning terms.
demolition of all buildings, and the construction of 48 dwellings, formation of a new access onto Kilham Lane, provision of landscaping, public open space and drainage (phased development)
- Authority
- Winchester City Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Thandi B
- Postcode
- SO22 5PR
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether affordable housing on-site is required to make the scheme acceptable in planning terms
- Biodiversity Net Gain
- The effect of the proposed development upon the integrity of the Solent Special Protection Areas (SPAs)
What decided it
The failure to demonstrate that the proposed development would achieve nutrient neutrality and secure biodiversity net gain, with no legal agreements in place to secure off-site mitigation, meant the scheme conflicted with the development plan and could not proceed even under the tilted balance.
The harm to habitats sites and biodiversity conflicts with the development plan and provides a strong reason for refusal under NPPF paragraph 11(d), displacing the presumption in favour of sustainable development; even if the tilted balance applied, the harm would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of housing delivery.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CP3Policy CP15Policy CP16Policy H6
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 49Paragraph 50Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Winchester
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed15 October 20266012051Cupressus, Durley Brook Road, Southampton, SO32 2AR
- Dismissed14 October 20266011078Oakridge, Biddenfield Lane, Shedfield, SO32 2HP
- Allowed10 August 20266005547Land at Lower Paddock, Bent Lane, Hambledon, PO7 4QP
- Dismissed3 August 202660042333, Farm Cottages, Knowle, PO17 5LZ
- Allowed29 July 2026600546362 Downs Road,, South Wonston,, Winchester, SO21 3EW
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®