Planning appeal decision
Land at Rochdale Rufc, Clubhouse Close, Rochdale, OL11 5LU
Planning appeal 3371622 at Land at Rochdale Rufc, Clubhouse Close, Rochdale, OL11 5LU (Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 2 February 2026 by Inspector Williams K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area and on the living conditions of neighbouring residents with particular regard to outlook, and if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed taking into account any suitable alternatives.
for the removal of the existing 15m monopole supporting 3 no. antennas, removal of 4 no. equipment cabinets,1 no. electric meter cabinets, timber fence and the installation of a new 12m pole with flood lights, new 20m lattice tower supporting 6 no. antennas, 2 no. transmission dishes, 4 no. replacement equipment cabinets, 1 no. replacement electric meter cabinet, 2.4m palisade fence and ancillary development there to including Ericson Radio Systems (ERS’s) and 1 no. GPS module.’
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- telecoms · Minor retail and services
- Inspector
- Williams K
- Postcode
- OL11 5LU
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area and on the living conditions of neighbouring residents with particular regard to outlook, and if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed taking into account any suitable alternatives
What decided it
The proposal's material harm to character, appearance and residential outlook was not outweighed by operational benefits because reasonable alternative sites within the RRUFC grounds may exist that could deliver the required coverage and capacity with reduced visual impact.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy P1Policy P3Policy DM1Policy E1Policy JP-P1Policy JP-C2Policy CF/6
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 122
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed19 October 2026601499419 Town House Road, Littleborough, Rochdale, OL15 9BG
- Dismissed25 September 2026601363522 Hawthorn Road, Rochdale, OL11 5JQ
- Dismissed2 September 2026600497777 Long Street, Middleton, M24 6UN
- Allowed30 July 20266005921Hollingworth Heights, Peanock Lane, Littleborough, OL15 0AD
- Dismissed18 June 20266005050Harwood Street Garage, Harwood Street, Littleborough, Rochdale, OL15 8NA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®