Planning appeal decision
Galleon Wharf, Old Wolverton Road, Old Wolverton, Milton Keynes, MK12 5NL
Planning appeal 3372047 at Galleon Wharf, Old Wolverton Road, Old Wolverton, Milton Keynes, MK12 5NL (Milton Keynes Council) was dismissed on 6 March 2026 by Inspector Jones RE, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposals on the setting of designated heritage assets, including the Grade II* listed Church of the Holy Trinity and the Scheduled Ancient Monument encompassing motte and bailey castle, deserted village and monastic grange at Old Wolverton [SAM] [Appeal A and B].
Demolition of existing warehousing and redevelopment for 9 dwellings including parking, landscaping and associated works
- Authority
- Milton Keynes Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Jones RE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposals on the setting of designated heritage assets, including the Grade II* listed Church of the Holy Trinity and the Scheduled Ancient Monument encompassing motte and bailey castle, deserted village and monastic grange at Old Wolverton [SAM] [Appeal A and B]
- The effect of the proposals on the character and appearance of the surrounding area [Appeal A and B]
- The effect of the proposals on the provision of employment sites in the area [Appeal A and B]
- Whether or not sufficient information has been submitted in respect of biodiversity net gain (BNG) to comply with the provisions of local and national policy [Appeal A]
- The effect of the proposed parking arrangement on highway safety [Appeal A]
What decided it
Appeal A turned on the significant less-than-substantial heritage harm to the SAM and listed church (compounded by conflict with settlement strategy) not being outweighed by the public benefits, whereas Appeal B turned on the site being treated as brownfield land effectively within the settlement, attracting substantial Framework weight that outweighed the settlement-strategy policy conflict.
Appeal A: the significant heritage harm, moderate landscape/character harm and significant conflict with housing strategy policies outweighed the significant benefits of housing delivery, brownfield reuse, BNG and economic benefits, so the balance fell against the proposal. Appeal B: the substantial weight given to reuse of brownfield land within the settlement, together with minor benefits, outweighed the moderate conflict with the Council's settlement strategy, so the balance fell in favour of the proposal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy HE1Policy DS6Policy D1Policy D2Policy D3Policy D7Policy NE5Policy NE3Policy ER2Policy CT10Policy DS1Policy DS2Policy DS5
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 125Paragraph 187Paragraph 55
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Milton Keynes Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed19 October 202660124661 Worth Court, Milton Keynes, MK109LU
- Dismissed13 August 2026600734274 Church Green Road, Bletchley, MK3 6BY
- Planning permission granted9 July 20263355968Unit Nine, 9 Bridgeturn Avenue, Old Wolverton, Milton Keynes, MK12 5QL
- Dismissed7 May 20263372531First Circle Packaging Ltd, Jenna Way, Interchange Park, Newport Pagnell, MK16 9QJ
- Dismissed17 March 20266002793Barns at Rookery Farm, East End, North Crawley, MK16 9HW
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®