Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 December 20253372400

Highstead Meadow, Boyden Gate Hill, Chislet, CANTERBURY, Kent, CT3 4ED

the change of use of land for the stationing of 2no. mobile homes, alongside 2no. caravans and car parking

Authority
Canterbury City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
caravan-gypsy · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Wright A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the integrity of the Thanet Coast and Sandwich Bay SPA
  • whether the site would be a suitable location for the proposed use, having regard to the provisions of the development plan and the accessibility of services and facilities
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including its effect on the setting and significance of the Highstead (Chislet) Conservation Area
  • the effect of the development on the supply of agricultural land
  • whether the proposed scheme would deliver mandatory biodiversity net gain

What decided it

The proposal would have a significant unmitigated effect on the integrity of the Thanet Coast and Sandwich Bay SPA, which the Habitats Regulations direct must not be granted.

Framework references: 11, 28, 195

Plan policies cited: SP1, SP6, LB5, SP4, HD10, DBE3, LB4, HE1, HE6, EMP12, LB8, LB9

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.