®Planning appeal decision
Penthouse , 95 Eaton Square, London, SW1W 9AQ
Planning appeal 3372614 at Penthouse , 95 Eaton Square, London, SW1W 9AQ (City of Westminster Council) was dismissed on 6 March 2026 by Inspector Simpson V, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the consequences of varying condition 1 of planning permission ref 24/06846/FULL and the works would (i) preserve the Grade II* listed building 83-102 Eaton Square or any features of special architectural or historic interest which it possesses, (ii) preserve the settings of neighbouring listed buildings, and (iii) preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Belgravia Conservation Area.
described as ‘LBC to accompany a Section 73 Application (Minor Material Amendment) - ref: PP-13968271 to approved Planning and Listed Building Applications 24/06846/FULL and 24/06847/LBC. The application proposes minor alterations to the approved fenestration of the front elevation, specifically: 1. The fenestration for each former Flat T bay revised to include three pairs of double sliding doors. 2. The omission of the consented intermediate nib walls fronting the approved sliding doors of the former Flat U bays.’
- Authority
- City of Westminster Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Simpson V
- Postcode
- SW1W 9AQ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the consequences of varying condition 1 of planning permission ref 24/06846/FULL and the works would (i) preserve the Grade II* listed building 83-102 Eaton Square or any features of special architectural or historic interest which it possesses, (ii) preserve the settings of neighbouring listed buildings, and (iii) preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Belgravia Conservation Area
What decided it
The harm caused to the significance of the Grade II* listed building by the proposed alterations to the front elevation, which would not be outweighed by the modest public benefits of the scheme.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 38Policy 39Policy 40
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 212Paragraph 215
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision
More decisions in City of Westminster Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed28 October 202660123391 Bear Street, London, WC2H 7DZ
- Dismissed28 October 2026600992025 Monmouth Road, London, W2 4UT
- Dismissed21 October 20266014604South Terrace, Third and Fourth Floor, 4 Matthew Parker Street, London, SW1H 9NP
- Dismissed21 October 20266012002Flat B, 9 Durham Terrace, London, W2 5PB
- Allowed21 October 2026601140517 Bruton Street, London, W1J 6QB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.