Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 January 20263372676

14 Oakley Gardens, LONDON, SW3 5QG

the erection of a mansard roof with 1 no. dormer on west elevation

Authority
Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Morrison A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and area, including whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Cheyne Conservation Area

What decided it

The proposal would fail to preserve the character and appearance of the Cheyne Conservation Area through its unsympathetic scale and design, resulting in less than substantial harm to a designated heritage asset that is not outweighed by minor public benefits.

Framework references: 215

Plan policies cited: Policy CD1, Policy CD2, Policy CD4, Policy CD12, Policy CD15

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.