Planning appeal decision
14 Oakley Gardens, LONDON, SW3 5QG
the erection of a mansard roof with 1 no. dormer on west elevation
- Authority
- Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Morrison A
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and area, including whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Cheyne Conservation Area
What decided it
The proposal would fail to preserve the character and appearance of the Cheyne Conservation Area through its unsympathetic scale and design, resulting in less than substantial harm to a designated heritage asset that is not outweighed by minor public benefits.
Framework references: 215
Plan policies cited: Policy CD1, Policy CD2, Policy CD4, Policy CD12, Policy CD15
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®