A and K Nurseries, Arterial Road, Rayleigh, SS6 7XT

Planning appeal 3372825 at A and K Nurseries, Arterial Road, Rayleigh, SS6 7XT (Rochford District Council) was dismissed on 15 December 2025 by Inspector Phillips A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework 2024 and relevant development plan policies.

Siting of 3 No. containers for B8 (Storage and Distribution) Use

Authority: Rochford District Council
Appeal type: minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure: Written Representations
Development: employment-industrial · Other minor developments
Inspector: Phillips A
Postcode: SS6 7XT

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework 2024 and relevant development plan policies
The effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The appellant failed to establish that the location of the three containers constitutes previously developed land, making the proposal inappropriate development in the Green Belt that cannot be justified by very special circumstances.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies: GB1GB2
National Planning Policy Framework: Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 85Paragraph 87Paragraph 88

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

111 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision

An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter — Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.

Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app — Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.

Start your free trial

More decisions in Rochford

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

Dismissed1 October 20266008122
Milan Villa, Hyde Wood Lane , Canewdon, Rochford, SS4 3RR
Notice varied and upheld2 September 20263372996
Land at Limehouse Nursery (Also Known As 401 Eastwood Road), The Drive, Rayleigh, Essex, SS6 7LJ
Allowed9 July 20266004863
9 College Gardens, Rochford, SS4 1YL
Dismissed4 June 20266006133
The Barns, Blounts Farm, Murrels Lane, SS5 6AB
Dismissed5 May 20266001653
St. Mary’s House, Rectory Road, Hawkwell, SS5 4LL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.