Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed23 December 20253372922

Land to side and rear of Woodlands Cottage, Eastbourne Road, Halland, BN8 6PU

the erection of a minimum of a single dwelling and a maximum of a single dwelling to the rear of existing dwelling along with associated access works and erection of replacement detached garage following removal of existing garage

Authority
Wealden District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Rawle S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether or not the appeal site is an appropriate location for the proposed development having regard to the settlement strategy and development plan and national policies relating to development within rural areas

What decided it

The engagement of paragraph 11(d) of the Framework due to the Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply, combined with the site's sustainable location with access to day-to-day facilities and public transport, meant that the modest conflict with development plan policies was outweighed by the benefits of housing delivery.

The conflict with development plan policies restricting countryside housing was afforded moderate weight, but this was balanced against moderate weight given to the benefits of the proposal (housing delivery in a context of significant shortfall, modest economic and social benefits, and accordance with the Framework's sustainability aims), with the tilted balance under paragraph 11(d) weighing substantially in favour of the scheme.

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: GD2, DC17, EN1, WCS2, WCS6, SPO7, SPO13, WCS14

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.