Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 December 20253373000

Weybridge Bowling Club , 19 Springfield Lane, Weybridge, KT13 8AW

Planning appeal 3373000 at Weybridge Bowling Club , 19 Springfield Lane, Weybridge, KT13 8AW (Elmbridge Borough Council) was dismissed on 12 December 2025 by Inspector Heppell J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: highway safety.

outline application for a development of up to 9 self-build residential units (all matters reserved)

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Heppell J
Postcode
KT13 8AW

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • highway safety
  • the character and appearance of the area
  • the living conditions of neighbouring residents with particular reference to disturbance

What decided it

The unacceptable impact on highway safety from inadequate visibility splays and forward visibility, requiring vehicles to reverse along Springfield Lane with danger to pedestrians and cyclists, outweighed the housing benefits even under the tilted balance.

The significant positive weight given to the delivery of nine dwellings on a sustainably located site and housing benefits was outweighed by the considerable negative weight accorded to highway safety harm and moderate negative weight to the loss of a section of locally listed wall, such that adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed benefits when assessed against the Framework as a whole.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS25 of the Elmbridge Core Strategy July 2011Policy CS17 of the Elmbridge Core Strategy July 2011Policy DM7 of the Elmbridge Local Plan Development Management Plan April 2015Policy DM2 of the Elmbridge Local Plan Development Management Plan April 2015Policy DM5 of the Elmbridge Local Plan Development Management Plan April 2015
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 216
Judgments
Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

204 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Elmbridge Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed8 October 20253359096
    Land at Hunters Lodge, Horsley Road, Downside, Surrey, KT11 3NY
  2. Dismissed28 October 20266013396
    23 Avondale Avenue, Esher, KT10 0DB
  3. Dismissed21 October 20266013327
    69 Alexandra Road, Thames Ditton, KT7 0QS
  4. Dismissed16 October 20266008605
    Pavement Outside Tesco Stores Ltd, 108 - 118 Walton Road East Molesey, East Molesey, KT8 0HP
  5. Dismissed16 October 20266008598
    Pavement Outside Tesco Ltd, 108 – 118 Walton Road, East Molesey, KT8 0HP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.