Planning appeal decision
11 Huntsmans Meadow, Ascot, Windsor And Maidenhead, SL5 7PF
Planning appeal 3373013 at 11 Huntsmans Meadow, Ascot, Windsor And Maidenhead, SL5 7PF (Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead) was dismissed on 23 December 2025 by Inspector Morris T, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.
renovation and extension of existing single-storey dwelling to include replacement of the existing conservatory with a garden facing office, partial increase to two storeys, replacement roof structure, recladding and installation of new windows and doors
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Morris T
- Postcode
- SL5 7PF
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposed development on protected species
What decided it
The proposal's incongruous design, particularly the mono-pitched roof form combined with irregular fenestration and modern materials, would be significantly harmful to the character and appearance of the area and conflict with the development plan.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy QP 3 of the Royal Borough of Windsor & Maidenhead Borough Local Plan (2022)Policy NP/DG1 of the Ascot, Sunninghill & Sunningdale Neighbourhood Plan (2014)Policy NP/DG2 of the Ascot, Sunninghill & Sunningdale Neighbourhood Plan (2014)Policy NP/DG3 of the Ascot, Sunninghill & Sunningdale Neighbourhood Plan (2014)Policy NR2 of the Royal Borough of Windsor & Maidenhead Borough Local Plan (2022)Policy NP/EN4 of the Ascot, Sunninghill & Sunningdale Neighbourhood Plan (2014)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Notice upheld24 September 20263353235Sunnyside Stanwell Road, Horton, Slough, SL3 9PE
- Notice upheld24 September 20263353234Sunnyside Stanwell Road, Horton, Slough, SL3 9PE
- Dismissed28 May 2025335725311 Brompton Drive, Maidenhead, Berkshire, SL6 6SP
- Notice varied and upheld8 April 20253329755193 Coppermill Road, Staines-upon-thames, Surrey, TW19 5NW
- Allowed14 March 20243329117The Arcade , High Street, Cookham, Maidenhead, Kent, SL6 9TA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®