Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed21 January 20263373937

56 Aberford Road, Oulton, Leeds, LS26 8HP

Authority
Leeds City Council
Appeal type
advert · Advertisement Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
advertisement · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Storey P

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed advertisement would pose an unacceptable risk to public safety, with specific regard to the safety of vehicles and pedestrians using the public highway

What decided it

The appellant's Highway Safety Report persuasively demonstrated that the static digital display would not create an unacceptable public safety risk to vehicles or pedestrians, and this assessment was not contradicted by substantive evidence or the Inspector's site observations.

Framework references: 141

Plan policies cited: Saved Policy GP5 of the Leeds UDP Review – Volume 1: Written Statement – Adopted July 2006, Policy T2 of the Core Strategy (as amended by the Core Strategy Selective Review 2019)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.