Planning appeal decision
245 Ecclesall Road, Sheffield, S11 8JE
Planning appeal 3374235 at 245 Ecclesall Road, Sheffield, S11 8JE (Sheffield City Council) was decided (quashed on legal grounds) on 6 May 2026 by Inspector Kean G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether a car park use is acceptable in this location having regard to local and national planning policies that promote sustainable transport.
without planning permission, the change of use of the Land for the use as a car park for use by motor vehicles at the site of 245 Ecclesall Road, Sheffield, S11 8JE
- Authority
- Sheffield City Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- other · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Kean G
- Postcode
- S11 8JE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether a car park use is acceptable in this location having regard to local and national planning policies that promote sustainable transport
- the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area including highway safety
- if the development is otherwise acceptable in planning terms whether, having regard to the alternative housing scheme, the unauthorised use should be refused as conflicting with local or national planning policy or other material considerations
What decided it
The existence of an extant, implemented planning permission for housing on the site, combined with the Council's inability to demonstrate five-year housing land supply, created exceptional circumstances where refusal of the car park use would materially assist in progressing the approved housing scheme, whereas permission would provide passive income incentivising continued delay of redevelopment.
the benefits of delivering housing on a brownfield site in a context of insufficient housing land supply outweighed the benefits of continued car park use, particularly given the tenant's financial incentive to delay redevelopment and the Council's active engagement with the landowner to progress the approved scheme
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- UDP Policy IB6UDP Policy IB9UDP Policy BE9CS Policy CS53CS Policy CS66CS Policy CS74Draft Policy AS1Draft Policy SWS03
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 123Paragraph 124Paragraph 125
- Judgments
- Stringer v MHLG [1970] 1 WLR 1281; R. (On the application of Mount Cook and Ltd) v Westminster CC [2003] EWCA Civ 1346; [2004] 2 P. & C.R. 22
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Sheffield City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Notice varied and upheld17 September 20263378304Step Rehabilitation, 30 Troutbeck Road, Sheffield, S7 2QA
- Notice varied and upheld7 September 20263376754Land at the Junction of Spital Street, Sorby Street, And Carlisle Street,, Sheffield, S4 7LJ
- Notice varied and upheld7 September 20263374622Land At Rear Of 551-561 Attercliffe Road, Kimberley Street, Sheffield, S9 3RA
- Split Decision23 July 20263377264Samehill Farm and Land to East , Hagg Lane, Sheffield, S10 5PX
- Notice varied and upheld20 July 20263361302Land to North Side of Rotherham Road, Beighton, Sheffield, S20 1AG
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®