Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld31 March 20263374326

Land Lying to South West of Tilthams Corner Road, (Known As The Loseley), Godalming, Surrey, GU5 0BT

Planning appeal 3374326 at Land Lying to South West of Tilthams Corner Road, (Known As The Loseley), Godalming, Surrey, GU5 0BT (Guildford Borough Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 31 March 2026 by Inspector Graham J, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The implications of the fact that the Appeal Site is located within the Green Belt.

Without planning permission, the material change of use of the land for residential purposes, through the siting of caravans and associated unauthorised operational development, including building and engineering operations comprising buildings, installation of cesspit / septic tanks and drainage works, the creation of an access and the laying of material to create a hardsurface

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Hearing
Development
caravan-gypsy · Minor traveller and caravan pitches
Inspector
Graham J
Postcode
GU5 0BT

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The implications of the fact that the Appeal Site is located within the Green Belt
  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect of the development on the safety and function of the local road network
  • Whether the Appeal Site is a "sustainable location" for the development
  • The need for, and supply of, Gypsy and Traveller pitches
  • The personal circumstances of the Appellants and other occupiers of the Appeal Site, and the best interests of any children involved

What decided it

The significant and substantial harm to the character and appearance of the area and the setting of the Surrey Hills National Landscape, found to constitute a strong reason for refusal under NPPF paragraph 189, which disapplied the tilted balance and was not outweighed by the benefits of meeting unmet Gypsy and Traveller need.

The substantial harm from inappropriate development in the Green Belt (including harm to openness and Green Belt purposes) combined with the significant/substantial harm to the character and appearance of the area and SHNL setting, plus limited weight against the intentional unauthorised development, outweighed the considerable weight attached to the unmet need for pitches, lack of five-year supply, absence of alternative sites, personal circumstances and best interests of the children, so planning permission was refused.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy P1Policy D1Policy D4Policy ID3Policy P2Policy P7(1)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 153Paragraph 160Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 189Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 116Paragraph 11Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 187Paragraph 191
Judgments
Quarry Mews Ltd v SSHCLG & Oxford CC [2025] EWHC 1968 (Admin)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

56 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Guildford Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. decided16 October 20266010712
    9 Baldwin Crescent, Guildford, GU4 7XW
  2. Allowed15 October 20266008529
    Shortland Farm, Guildford Road, Ash, GU12 6DF
  3. Allowed14 October 20266009751
    Land South of Green Lane, West Horsley, GU23 6PQ
  4. Dismissed6 October 20266009810
    Hogs Back Farm Yard, Monkshatch, Compton, GU3 1DL
  5. Allowed5 October 20266012736
    The Cottage, Blanket Mill Farm, Goose Rye Road, Worplesdon, Guildford, GU3 3RQ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.