Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed2 March 20263374708

Bythorne Cottage, Brent Pelham, Buntingford, SG9 0AP

Planning appeal 3374708 at Bythorne Cottage, Brent Pelham, Buntingford, SG9 0AP (East Hertfordshire District Council) was dismissed on 2 March 2026 by Inspector Parton T, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would make adequate provision for biodiversity net gain.

to demolish existing stables and attached outbuildings and erect a single dwelling house C3 in similar location utilising the existing and lawful access

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Parton T
Postcode
SG9 0AP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would make adequate provision for biodiversity net gain
  • whether the appeal site would be an appropriate location for the proposed development, having regard to the accessibility of services and facilities

What decided it

The proposed development fails to comply with the mandatory statutory requirement to deliver at least 10% biodiversity net gain under Schedule 7A of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, with no mechanism to secure this objective.

The moderate benefits of housing delivery and socio-economic benefits were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the substantial weight of the biodiversity-related conflicts with Schedule 7A of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 and Policy NE3 of the development plan.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy NE3Policy DPS2Policy VILL3Policy GBR2Policy TRA1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 57Paragraph 110Paragraph 187Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

9 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in East Hertfordshire District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed28 October 20266008487
    The Ranch House, Amwell Hill, Great Amwell, Ware, SG12 9QZ
  2. Allowed23 October 20266006221
    Land Off Chapel Lane, Little Hadham, SG11 2AB
  3. Dismissed19 October 20266009679
    Land to the West of Ginns Road, Ginns Road, Stocking Pelham, SG9 0JD
  4. Dismissed15 October 20266010602
    Duck Street Cottage, The Street, Furneux Pelham, SG9 0LA
  5. Dismissed15 October 20266005090
    Hare Street House, Hare Street Buntinford, SG9 0DY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.