Planning appeal decision
Greystones Chalkpit Lane, Betchworth, RH3 7EZ
Planning appeal 3374870 at Greystones Chalkpit Lane, Betchworth, RH3 7EZ (Mole Valley District Council) was dismissed on 10 June 2026 by Inspector Coles C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the appeal site would be grey belt with particular reference to whether the site's location in the Surrey Hills National Landscape (SHNL) and the Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) provides a strong reason for refusing or restricting the development and whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt.
erection of a single detached dwelling
- Authority
- Mole Valley District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Coles C
- Postcode
- RH3 7EZ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the appeal site would be grey belt with particular reference to whether the site's location in the Surrey Hills National Landscape (SHNL) and the Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) provides a strong reason for refusing or restricting the development and whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
- The effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
- The effect of the proposal on character and appearance of the area
- If the development is inappropriate, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would result in substantial harm to its openness and character, with no very special circumstances advanced to outweigh this harm in a context where the local planning authority can demonstrate a five-year housing land supply.
The substantial harm to the openness of the Green Belt and other harms were not outweighed by other considerations including removal of temporary structures, landscaping benefits, environmental credentials and space standards, particularly given the Council's five-year housing land supply
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy EN1Policy EN4Policy EN8Policy EN9Policy P1Policy P2Policy P3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 143Paragraph 152Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 189
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mole Valley District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed20 October 20266013764Priory Lodge, River Lane, Leatherhead, KT22 0AU
- Dismissed19 October 20266011465Land to the South-East of Yarm Way, Leatherhead, KT22 8RQ
- Dismissed16 September 20266008528Henhurst Lodge, Beare Green Road, Beare Green, RH5 4PX
- Allowed11 September 20266012763Fourays, Horsham Road, Capel, Dorking, RH5 5LF
- Dismissed9 September 20266005433Land Opposite Manor House,, Headley, Headley Common, KT18 6NA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®