Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 January 20263375304

Rear Of 242 Collingwood Road, , Sutton, , SM1 2NX

change of use from garage into a 1 bedroom dwelling

Authority
London Borough of Sutton
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Dring G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposal on highway safety
  • whether the proposal would provide satisfactory carbon emission reduction and water efficiency measures
  • whether the proposal would provide suitable living conditions for future occupants with regard to the provision of external space and outlook

What decided it

The proposal conflicts with the development plan on multiple grounds including harmful effects on character and appearance, highway safety concerns, failure to meet carbon emission reduction requirements, and substandard outlook for future occupants, with no material considerations indicating it should be determined otherwise.

Plan policies cited: Policy 28 of the Sutton Local Plan 2016-2031, Policy D3 of The London Plan March 2021, Policy D4 of The London Plan March 2021, Creating Locally Distinctive Places: Sutton's Urban Design Guide – Supplementary Planning Document 14 January 2008, Policy 36 of the Sutton Local Plan 2016-2031, Policy 37 of the Sutton Local Plan 2016-2031, Policy SI 2 of The London Plan March 2021, Policy 31 of the Sutton Local Plan 2016-2031, Policy SI 5 of The London Plan March 2021, Policy 33 of the Sutton Local Plan 2016-2031, Policy 9 of the Sutton Local Plan 2016-2031, Policy D6 of The London Plan March 2021

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.