Planning appeal decision
Kipling Farm, Kipling Avenue, Tilbury, Essex, RM18 8HF
Planning appeal 3375521 at Kipling Farm, Kipling Avenue, Tilbury, Essex, RM18 8HF (Thurrock Borough Council) was dismissed on 2 February 2026 by Inspector Shearing C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt.
Outline planning application seeking determination of access for development comprising up to 30 residential units with associated amenity space, parking and strategic landscaping. All other matters reserved”
- Authority
- Thurrock Borough Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Shearing C
- Postcode
- RM18 8HF
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
- The effects of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- Whether the proposal could reasonably avoid other harmful effects, with particular regard to the living conditions of its future occupiers, neighbouring occupiers and the character and appearance of the area
- Whether the proposal would make appropriate contributions to off-site infrastructure
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The substantial harm to Green Belt openness caused by the introduction of 30 residential units, to which the Framework requires substantial weight, was not clearly outweighed by the housing benefits, even accounting for the Council's severe housing land supply shortfall.
The benefits of housing delivery (30 homes, 50% affordable, on settlement edge with good accessibility) were given significant weight but did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to Green Belt openness and the harm from inappropriateness, to which substantial weight was required.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy PMD6Policy CSSP4Policy PMD1Policy PMD2Policy CSTP23
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 155Paragraph 156Paragraph 58
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Thurrock
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed5 October 20266008794Milo, South Avenue, Langdon Hills, SS16 6JG
- Dismissed29 September 20266009919Land Rear of Ewen House, High Road, Fobbing, SS17 9JH
- Allowed9 July 20266003807Former London Brigade Sports & Social Club, Purfleet Road, Aveley, Thurrock, RM15 4DT
- Dismissed8 June 20266005261The Laurels, Print Shop And Office Lower Dunton Road, Horndon On The Hill, SS17 8QD
- Dismissed5 June 20266004979The Eves, Malvina Close, Horndon On The Hill, SS17 8QG
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®